TABLE 2.
Descriptive Statistics for the EBP Adherence and Health Outcomes Study Populations
| EBP Adherence Sample | Health Outcomes Sample | |
|---|---|---|
| Facility-level variables | N=15 | N=60 |
| Research hub, No. (%) | ||
| Agra | – | 9 (15.0) |
| Gorakhpur | – | 11 (18.3) |
| Lucknow | 15 (100.0) | 19 (31.7) |
| Meerut | – | 7 (11.7) |
| Varanasi | – | 14 (23.3) |
| High priority district, No. (%) | 7 (46.7) | 7 (11.7) |
| Distance to district hospital (km), mean (SD) | 29.5 (12.0) | 29.5 (14.0) |
| Number of skilled birth attendants, mean (SD) | 4.5 (1.1) | 4.4 (1.2) |
| Annual delivery load, mean (SD) | 1,795 (468.0) | 1,599 (435.0) |
| Birth-level variables | N=2,083 | N=80,234 |
| Birth occurred on coaching day, No. (%) | 107 (5.1) | 7,533 (9.4) |
| Months since intervention started at facility, mean (SD) | 8.5 (5.8) | 6.7 (2.8) |
| EBP adherence (of 18 practices), mean (SD) | 12.1 (2.4) | – |
| Primary composite,a No. (%) | – | 12,062 (15.0) |
| Secondary composite, No. (%) | – | 3,907 (4.9) |
Abbreviations: EBP, essential birth practices; SD, standard deviation.
a
457 births are missing data on maternal morbidity, and therefore, are missing data on the primary composite outcome.