. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Apr;22(2):384–396. doi: 10.1007/s11307-019-01382-x

Table 2.

Histogram parameters of Type-3 and Type-4 normalizations, corresponding to ROI-1 and ROI-2, which provide significance difference (p < 0.05), using One-way ANOVA, between different groups of intra cranial mass lesions.

	ROI-1			ROI-2
	Histogram parameters	p value (ANOVA)	p value (post hoc)	Histogram parameters	p value (ANOVA)	p value (post hoc)
Type-3 normalization	skewness	0.06	0.05^c	mtop50	0.04	0.06^b
	sdtoplO	0.05	0.05^b	mtop75	0.03	0.05^b
	sdtop50	0.05	0.04^b	mtop90	0.03	0.06^b
	sdtop75	0.06	0.05^b
Type-4 normalization	sdtop25	0.04	0.03^b	mean	0.03	0.04^b
	sdtop50	0.02	0.01^b	SD	0.05	0.04^b
	sdtop75	0.02	0.0l^b	median	0.03	0.05^b
				mode	0.02	0.04^a
				mtop10	0.03	0.04^b
				mtop25	0.02	0.03^b
				mtop50	0.01	0.02^b
				mtop75	0.01	0.01^b
				mtop90	0.01	0.01^b
				sdtop25	0.03	0.03^b

p < 0.05 between low grade glioma (LGG) and high grade glioma (HGG)

p < 0.05 between low grade glioma (LGG) and infection

p < 0.05 between high grade glioma (HGG) and infection