Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 11;267(4):1004–1011. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09667-5

Table 2.

Results of secondary outcome measures

Treatment-refractory MG (n = 14) Treatment-responsive MG (N = 112) p value*
Myasthenic crisis 2 (14.3%) 8 (7.1%) 0.351
Severe exacerbation 9 (64.3%) 30 (26.8%) 0.004
Mortality 2 (14.3%) 10 (8.9%) 0.52
MGFA at last FU  < 0.000
 Asymptomatic 1 (7.1%) 77 (68.8%)
 1 3 (21.4%) 7 (6.3%)
 2 6 (42.9%) 24 (21.4%)
 3 4 (28.6%) 4 (3.6%)
 4 0 0
 5 0 0
MGFA-PIS at last FU** NA
 CSR 12 (10.7%)
 PR 19 (17%)
 MM-0 0
 MM-1 2 (1.8%)
 MM-2 6 (5.4%)
 MM-3 1 (7.1%) 38 (33.9%)
Median time onset to FU 90.5 months (IQR 104) 70 months (IQR 67) 0.047
Median number of rescue treatments per patient with IVIG, PLEX or IA 3 (IQR 6) 0.5 (IQR 1) 0.002
Median number of different IS treatments 3 (IQR 1) 2 (IQR 1)  < 0.000
Escalation IS treatment*** 12 (85.7%) 6 (5.4%)  < 0.000
Side effects of IS treatment 8 (57.1%) 42 (37.5%) 0.23
Treatment at last FU
 Pyridostigmine 12 (85.7%) 73 (65.2%) 0.12
 IS treatment 14 (100%) 84 (75%) 0.034
 Maintenance IVIG/PLEX/IA 5 (35.7%) 3 (2.7%)  < 0.000

Results of secondary outcome measures. Significance level after correction for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni correction) is P ≤ 0.004

CSR denotes complete stable remission, FU follow-up, IA immunoadsorption, IS immunosuppressive, IVIG intravenous immunoglobulins, MG myasthenia gravis, MGFA Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, MM minimal manifestation, NA not applicable, PIS postintervention status, PLEX plasma exchange therapy and PR pharmacologic remission

*p values were obtained with the Mann–Whitney U or Student’s t test (for continuous variables) and the Chi-squared test (for categorical variables) as appropriate

**16 patients in the treatment-responsive group did not meet the time criterion (duration of at least 1 year) of MGFA-PIS definitions

***Escalation IS treatment was defined as treatment with rituximab or cyclophosphamide

Statistically significant