Table 3.
Correlations on accuracy between biological motion and attention tasks, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity for younger participants
Measure | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Facing direction | – |
0.285 0.067 |
− 0.044 0.780 |
− 0.014 0.930 |
0.264 0.092 |
− 0.010 0.950 |
− 0.118 0.459 |
2. Visual search | – |
− 0.112 0.478 |
0.098 0.538 |
0.384 0.012 |
− 0.212 0.177 |
− 0.122 0.441 |
|
3. Stroop task | – |
0.246 0.116 |
− 0.205 0.193 |
0.066 0.679 |
0.112 0.482 |
||
4. Spatial cueing | – |
− 0.263 0.092 |
− 0.038 0.810 |
0.053 0.738 |
|||
5. Target detection | – |
0.039 0.806 |
− 0.002 0.992 |
||||
6. Visual acuity | – |
0.464* 0.002 |
|||||
7. Contrast sensitivity | – |
None of the correlations between the biological motion and attention tasks were significant when using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery procedure (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995)
p values are in bold and Italics, *p < 0.0004