Table 5.
Split-half reliability correlations on reaction times across for younger participants
| Measure | Half A | Half B | r |
|---|---|---|---|
| M(SD) | M(SD] | ||
| Facing direction | 0.63 (0.23) | 0.62 (0.21) | 0.753 |
| Target detection | |||
| Present (2) | 1.1 (0.32) | 1.0 (0.29) | 0.627 |
| Present (3) | 1.2 (0.34) | 1.1 (0.31) | 0.844 |
| Present (4) | 1.4 (0.38) | 1.2 (0.37) | 0.668 |
| Absent (2) | 1.2 (0.33) | 1.1 (0.36) | 0.837 |
| Absent (3) | 1.4 (0.42) | 1.3 (0.35) | 0.750 |
| Absent (4) | 1.5 (0.36) | 1.4 (0.38) | 0.805 |
| Visual search | |||
| Present (4) | 0.71 (0.17) | 0.68 (0.16) | 0.803 |
| Present (8) | 0.83 (0.25) | 0.78 (0.30) | 0.787 |
| Present (16) | 0.89 (0.21) | 0.85 (0.25) | 0.835 |
| Absent (4) | 0.77 (0.20) | 0.74 (0.20) | 0.842 |
| Absent (8) | 0.87 (0.23) | 0.80 (0.26) | 0.681 |
| Absent (16) | 1.1 (0.30) | 0.97 (0.29) | 0.814 |
| Spatial cueing | |||
| Valid | 0.63 (0.14) | 0.62 (.14) | 0.544 |
| Invalid | 0.73 (0.16) | 0.72 (.16) | 0.756 |
| Neutral | 0.65 (0.13) | 0.71 (.27) | 0.814 |
| Stroop task | |||
| Congruent | 0.85 (0.29) | 0.75 (.17) | 0.303* |
| Incongruent | 0.98 (0.26) | 0.89 (.22) | 0.836 |
| Neutral | 0.86 (0.28) | 0.82 (.22) | 0.877 |
The correlations showed significant reliabilities for most conditions in all tasks
All correlations significant at p < 0.05 except *