Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 7;84(3):625–642. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1068-6

Table 6.

Split-half reliability correlations on reaction times across for older participants

Measure Half A HalfB r
M(SD) M(SD)
Facing direction 1.1 (.47) 0.97 (0.36) 0.756
Target detection
 Present (2) 1.4 (0.56) 1.2 (0.32) 0.708
 Present (3) 1.6 (0.51) 1.4 (0.34) 0.592
 Present (4) 1.7 (0.44) 1.5 (0.33) 0.784
 Absent (2) 1.6 (0.47) 1.5 (0.54) 0.450
 Absent (3) 1.8 (0.48) 1.7 (0.41) 0.642
 Absent (4) 2.1 (0.60) 1.8 (0.35) 0.646
Visual search
 Present (4) 0.89 (0.18) 82 (0.16) 0.826
 Present (8) 1.1 (0.37) .95 (0.25) 0.307*
 Present (16) 1.2 (0.41) 1.1 (0.25) 0.703
 Absent (4) 1.1 (0.32) .96 (0.29) 0.682
 Absent (8) 1.2 (0.38) 1.1 (0.36) 0.627
 Absent (16) 1.6 (0.49) 1.5 (0.63) 0.774
Spatial cueing
 Valid 0.97 (0.34) .89 (0.26) 0.574
 Invalid 1.2 (0.34) 1.1 (0.37) 0.841
 Neutral 1.0 (0.28) .99 (0.30) 0.842
Stroop task
 Congruent 1.3 (0.35) 1.1 (0.30) 0.708
 Incongruent 1.6 (0.57) 1.4 (0.45) 0.788
 Neutral 1.3 (0.42) 1.2 (0.37) 0.900

The correlations showed significant reliabilities for most conditions in all tasks

All correlations significant at p < 0.05 except *