Table 2.
Results of AGREE II evaluation.
| Inclusion of guidelines | Standardized scores in various domains (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope and purpose | Stakeholder Involvement | Rigor of Development | Clarity of Presentation | Applicability | Editorial Independence | |
| Gratzke et al., 2015 | 82 | 60 | 71 | 78 | 47 | 92 |
| Zhang et al., 2007 | 71 | 36 | 30 | 58 | 16 | 79 |
| Homma et al., 2017 | 80 | 36 | 56 | 80 | 19 | 38 |
| Zhu et al., 2011 | 63 | 29 | 10 | 49 | 7 | 0 |
| Cavalcanti et al., 2006 | 72 | 44 | 30 | 46 | 7 | 60 |
| Tammela et al., 2012 | 65 | 29 | 16 | 53 | 0 | 23 |
| Hofner, 2007 | 74 | 49 | 59 | 72 | 29 | 67 |
| Chapple, 2015 | 74 | 68 | 60 | 76 | 51 | 58 |
| Cockett et al., 1991 | 61 | 38 | 16 | 50 | 16 | 19 |
| Spatafora et al., 2012 | 76 | 38 | 50 | 78 | 25 | 31 |
| Chang, 1998 | 60 | 24 | 10 | 47 | 8 | 4 |
| Nickel et al., 2018 | 81 | 64 | 76 | 83 | 46 | 79 |
| Mcvary et al., 2011 | 78 | 49 | 53 | 79 | 48 | 85 |
| Bereczky et al., 2006 | 51 | 24 | 4 | 33 | 11 | 25 |
| Wang, 2015 | 78 | 47 | 20 | 64 | 19 | 0 |
| Yeo et al., 2016 | 70 | 36 | 51 | 64 | 11 | 34 |
| Zhang et al., 2016 | 78 | 56 | 14 | 80 | 2 | 0 |
| Sun et al., 2017 | 67 | 47 | 14 | 36 | 17 | 0 |
| Yu and Gao, 2017 | 61 | 44 | 4 | 44 | 23 | 0 |
| Zhang et al., 2017 | 67 | 30 | 14 | 38 | 11 | 0 |
| Geng, 2018 | 70 | 30 | 17 | 78 | 38 | 0 |
| Gravas et al., 2019 | 86 | 56 | 69 | 83 | 63 | 83 |
| Median | 71.5 | 41 | 25 | 64 | 18 | 28 |
| Q1 | 64 | 30 | 14 | 46.5 | 9.5 | 0 |
| Q3 | 78 | 52.5 | 57.5 | 78.5 | 42 | 73 |
| Range | 35 | 24 | 72 | 50 | 63 | 92 |
Q1, 1st quartile; Q3, 3rd quartile.