Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 6;10(2):124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2019.03.002

Table 3.

Effect of RS and CA extracts on study parameters.

Groups Body weight gain (g) Food intake (g/rat/day) Energy intake (Kcal/rat/day) Feed efficiency ratio (%) Glucose (mg/dL),
Day 0
Glucose (mg/dL),
Day 21
NPD 11.67 ± 1.67 9.59 ± 0.04 36.24 ± 0.14 15.36 ± 2.23 92.50 ± 3.94 90.00 ± 3.15
NPD + STZ 10.00 ± 2.89 10.25 ± 0.04 38.76 ± 0.14 12.29 ± 3.58 156.33 ± 4.78 97.17 ± 3.46
HFD + STZ 20.00 ± 1.83 19.90 ± 0.13z 109.87 ± 0.72z 8.67 ± 0.79x 349.67 ± 19.12z 405.83 ± 20.79z
RS4 16.67 ± 4.22 19.62 ± 0.18 108.29 ± 1.02 7.35 ± 1.87 341.00 ± 38.16 200.33 ± 41.89c
RS8 26.67 ± 3.07 21.11 ± 0.25 116.53 ± 1.39 10.89 ± 1.25 335.83 ± 39.00 144.33 ± 25.12c
CA4 22.50 ± 2.50 20.14 ± 0.69 111.19 ± 3.80 9.70 ± 1.19 353.50 ± 25.42 258.33 ± 36.56b
CA8 20.00 ± 1.83 19.98 ± 0.18 110.31 ± 0.99 8.62 ± 0.76 322.17 ± 33.81 136.33 ± 14.76c
MET 15.83 ± 2.01 18.38 ± 0.09b 101.46 ± 0.48b 7.43 ± 0.94 323.17 ± 38.29 129.00 ± 18.99c

Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM (n = 6), analyzed by one way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test. x denotes p < 0.05, z denotes p < 0.001 as compared to NPD, b denotes p < 0.01 & c denotes p < 0.001 as compared to HFD + STZ.