Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 10;7(11):e1564–e1574. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30393-6

Table 2.

Secondary outcomes, categorical variables

Number of participants/total with data available (n/N) Prevalence (%) Effect (95% CI)
Anaemia at day 84 (haemoglobin <110 g/L)
Reference group 63/139 45% ··
60 mg screen-and-treat approach 75/131 57% 11·9 (0·1 to 23·8)
30 mg screen-and-treat approach 86/145 59% 14·0 (2·5 to 25·5)
Ready-and-safe to receive iron at day 84 (hepcidin <2·5 μg/L)
Reference group 30/140 21% ··
60 mg screen-and-treat approach 55/132 42% 20·2 (9·4 to 31·1)
30 mg screen-and-treat approach 77/147 52% 31·0 (20·4 to 41·5)
Ferritin index >2·0 at day 84
Reference group 82/140 59% ··
60 mg screen-and-treat approach 116/133 87% 28·6 (18·7 to 38·6)
30 mg screen-and-treat approach 131/147 89% 30·5 (21·0 to 40·1)
Iron-deficiency anaemia at day 84
Reference group 24/140 17% ··
60 mg screen-and-treat approach 38/131 29% 11·9 (1·9 to 21·8)
30 mg screen-and-treat approach 58/146 40% 22·6 (12·5 to 32·7)
Iron dosage (% of weeks in which iron was received)
Reference group 1974/1974* 100% ··
60 mg screen-and-treat approach 1025/1905* 46% –53·8 (–56·0 to −51·6)
30 mg screen-and-treat approach 952/2009* 53% –47·4 (–49·6 to −45·2)
Adherence
Reference group 275/1974* 86% ··
60 mg screen-and-treat approach 260/1905* 86% 0·3 (0·3 to 0·3)
30 mg screen-and-treat approach 246/2009* 86% 1·7 (1·7 to 1·7)
*

Data are cases/person-weeks.