Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;90(6):1972–1985. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4077

Table 2.

Effects of weaning management and persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus exposure on performance of newly received beef calves

Auction market Preconditioned Contrast,1P =
Item Control PI-exposed Control PI-exposed SEM Management Exposure Interaction
No. pens2 14 14 12 11
BW, kg
    Initial 249 248 250 249 9.26 0.36 0.43 0.58
    d 14 257 258 273 273 9.75 < 0.001 0.60 0.72
    d 28 270 270 285 286 9.09 < 0.001 0.57 0.73
    d 42 286 283 301 299 7.51 < 0.001 0.19 0.71
ADG, kg
    d 0 to 14 0.54 0.77 1.64 1.66 0.19 < 0.001 0.16 0.20
    d 0 to 28 0.74 0.81 1.25 1.32 0.15 < 0.001 0.10 0.97
    d 28 to 42 1.10 0.89 1.13 0.90 0.15 0.77 0.003 0.87
    d 0 to 42 0.86 0.84 1.21 1.18 0.10 < 0.001 0.29 0.99

1Management = main effect of weaning management (auction market vs. preconditioned); Exposure = main effect of PI-BVDV exposure (control vs. persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus exposure); Interaction = management × exposure.

2Each pen consisted of 8 to 11 animals depending on block.