Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 12;8:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.09.002

Table 3.

Immunogenicity and protective activity of ACAM1000 and Dryvax® in mice and monkeys.

Study Species (strain) Vaccine (8 log10 pfu/mL) No. animals Immune response
Challenge Survival
Cutaneous pock N (%) Neutralizing antibody N (%) Neutralizing antibody titera IFN-γ secreting cells × 10−61
1 Mouse (Balb/c) ACAM1000 10 b 10 (100%) 53 Cowpox 10 LD50 INc 10/10 (100%)
Dryvax® 9 5 (56%) 14 7/7 (100%)
Sham 5 0 (0%) <10 0/5 (0%)



2 Mouse (Balb/c) ACAM1000 5 Vaccinia WR 100 LD50 INd 5/5 (100%)
Dryvax® 5 5/5 (100%)
Sham 5 0/5 (0%)



3 Mouse (Balb/c) ACAM1000 5 5 (100%) 92 1450
Dryvax® 5 3 (60%) 20 1052
Sham 5 0 (0%) <20 0



4 Mouse (Balb/c) ACAM1000 4 Ectromelia 4.3 log10 pfu aerosol 4/4 (100%)
Dryvax® 4 4/4 (100%)
Sham 4 0/4 (0%)



5 Monkey (rhesus) ACAM1000 6 6 (100%) 5 (83%) 18
Dryvax® 6 6 (100%) 4 (67%) 25
a

Geometric mean.

b

– = not tested.

c

5 weeks after vaccination.

d

3 weeks after vaccination.