Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;48(2):0300060520902606. doi: 10.1177/0300060520902606

Table 3.

Comparison of the ventilation parameters between the LMA and ETI groups.


MV (L/minute)

AP (cmH2O)
Time point LMA group (n = 40) ETI group (n = 40) LMA group (n = 40) ETI group (n = 40)
Completion of intubation (t0) 5.5 ± 0.8 5.6 ± 1.1 14.1 ± 2.0 14.6 ± 1.5
60 minutes after the start of surgery (t1) 5.5 ± 1.0 5.6 ± 1.0 15.9 ± 2.7**,# 14.8 ± 1.4
At the end of surgery (t2) 5.5 ± 1.0 5.6 ± 1.0 15.2 ± 2.4** 15.1 ± 1.3**
Integral analysis: Two-wayrepeated measures ANOVA: F, p
 Comparison between groups 0.060, 0.808 0.375, 0.542
 Time point comparison 2.367, 0.111 43.979, <0.001
 Time-group interaction effect 0.938, 0.373 26.439, <0.001

**p < 0.01 versus t0 (completion of intubation), #p < 0.05 versus group ETI.

LMA, laryngeal mask; ETI, endotracheal intubation; ANOVA, analysis of variance; AP, airway pressure; MV, minute ventilation.