Table 2: Comparison of Devices.
| IABP | iVAC | Impella 2.5 | Impella 5 | Impella RP | VA ECMO | TandemHeart | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bedside implantation | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| Pump mechanism | Pneumatic | Pneumatic | Axial | Axial | Axial | Centrifugal | Centrifugal |
| Cannula size | 7–8 Fr | 17 Fr | Catheter: 9 Fr Pump motor: 12 Fr |
Catheter: 9 Fr Pump motor: 21 Fr |
Catheter: 11 Fr Pump motor: 22 Fr |
18–21 Fr inflow 15–22 Fr outflow |
21 Fr inflow 15 Fr outflow |
| Flow (l/min) | 0.5–1.0 | 2 | 2.5 | 5 | >4 | > 4.5 | 5 |
| Insertion technique | Percutaneous | Percutaneous | Percutaneous | Surgical | Percutaneous | Percutaneous Surgical | Percutaneous |
| Implantation time | + | + | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Gas exchanger | - | - | - | - | - | ++++ | - |
| Metabolic support | - | - | - | - | - | ++++ | - |
| Left ventricular support | + | + | ++ | +++ | - | - | ++++ |
| Right ventricular support | - | - | - | - | +++ | ++++ | - |
| Biventricular support | - | - | - | - | + | - | - |
| Circulatory support | + | + | ++ | +++ | - | ++++ | ++ |
| Anticoagulation | + | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Haemolysis | + | + | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| Post-implantation management difficulty | + | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++++ |
| Level of evidence (European guidelines) | IIIb | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
IABP = intra-aortic balloon pump; N/A = not available; VA ECMO = venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; +,++,+++,++++ = relative qualitative grading concerning: time (implantation time); intensity (anticoagulation, post-implantation management difficulty, gas exchanger, metabolic support, left ventricular support, right ventricular support, biventricular support and circulatory support); and severity (haemolysis).