Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 17;184:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.01.001

Table 1.

Antigen, clonality, species, source, dilution, antigen retrieval and secondary antibodies used for IHC.

antigen clonality, clone, species source dilution antigen retrieval secondary Ab result
CD3 pc, rabbit DakoCytomation 1:500 Citrat GAR +
CD79α mc, HM57, mouse Abcam 1:5000 Citrat GAM (+)
CD20 pc, rabbit Thermo Fisher scientific 1:200 Citrat GAR +
Pax-5 mc, 24/Pax-5, mouse BD Biosciences 1:10 # GAM
Mum1 mc, MUM1p, mouse DakoCytomation 1:10 # GAM
Foxp3 mc, FJK-16s, rat eBioscience 1:10 # RAR
HLA-DR mc, TAL.1B5, mouse DakoCytomation 1:100 Citrat GAM +
Iba-1 pc, rabbit Wako 1:500 Citrat GAR +
CD68 mc, KP1, mouse DakoCytomation 1:100 Citrat GAM +
Myeloid/histiocyte
antigen
mc, MAC387, mouse DakoCytomation 1:500 Citrat GAM +
CD204 mc, SRA-E5, mouse Transgenic Inc. 1:1000 Citrat GAM +
CD205 mc, CC98, mouse AbD Serotec 1:10 # GAM
CD208 mc, 1010E1.01, rat Dendritics 1:200 Citrat RAR +
Lysozyme pc, rabbit Dako 1:10 # GAR

CD, cluster of differentiation; Pax-5, paired box protein 5; MUM1, multiple myeloma oncogene 1; Foxp3, forkhead box P3, HLA, human leucocyte antigen; Iba-1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; pc, polyclonal; mc, monoclonal; #, antigen retrieval was performed with boiling citrate buffer, pronase, and omission of pretreatment; GAR, goat anti-rabbit Immunoglobulin G (IgG); GAM, goat anti-mouse IgG; RAR, rabbit anti-rat IgG; +, positive; −, negative; (+) the antibody displayed a distinct immunoreaction on certain cells, but there was considerable background staining, false nuclear reactions, and the number of labeled cells was significantly lower than in the positive control of canine tissue.