Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2019 Jul 23;4(2):170–183. doi: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2930362

TABLE I.

Variables and parameters used within the theoretical model of coaxial prompt γ-ray detection, cf. fig. 1.

z beam axis coordinate [mm]
z0 front face position of water target 0 mm
zd front face position of the detector 152 mm
L length of the water phantom 150 mm
Rw proton range in water [mm]
r detector radius ½”
t detector thickness 1½”
Nγ γ-rays emitted per incident proton [ ]
g¯λ prompt γ-ray yield per unit length 6·10−4 mm−1
f¯ distal falloff slope 0.3 mm−1
τ transmission probability [ ]
μ¯w average absorption coefficient of water 10−4 mm−1
Ω/4π relative solid angle subtended [ ]
η probability of interaction in detector [ ]
μ¯d average attenuation coefficient of detector 2·10−2 mm−1
td decay time of the scintillation light pulse 16 ns
Np number of protons within one spot cluster 108
N^d prompt γ-rays detected per proton (theory) [ ]
Nd prompt γ-rays detected per spot (theory [ ]
Md prompt γ-rays measured per spot cluster [ ]
k¯γ ratio between all counts and the prompt γ-rays 2.5
N˙d,all overall detector count rate [Mcps]
Ip the proton beam (peak) current at the target 2 nA
e elementary charge 1.6·10−19 C
δR absolute error in the proton range Rw 1 mm
δz absolute error in the phantom position z0 1 mm
κ thickness of a cavity within the water target 2 mm
zκ front face position of a cavity within the target [mm]
ΔN relative count variation for a range error δR [ ]
ΔΩ relative count variation for a target error δz [ ]
Δγ γ-ray emission variation for a range error δR [ ]
Δκ relative count variation due to a cavity κ [ ]
Δs statistical measurement uncertainty [ ]
χ background fraction separated by energy filters 0.5
Σt proton bunch time spread (FWHM) 2 ns
Tp proton bunch period 9.4 ns