Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 18;2016(2):CD009231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009231.pub2

Grande 2000.

Methods RCT
Participants Requiring terminal care: treatment = 186 (87% with a diagnosis of cancer); control = 43 (86% with a diagnosis of cancer)
Living alone: treatment 21%, control 17%
Mean age: treatment 72 (SD 11); control 73 (SD 14)
Male 50%, female 54%
Survival from referral for both groups: a median of 11 days
Interventions Referred from primary or secondary care
6 qualified nurses, 2 nursing aides, a co‐ordinator (RGN level), agency staff providing 24‐hour care if required for a maximum of 2 weeks, most had Marie Curie experience Intervention participants could also access standard care
Control group received standard care: hospital care or hospice care, with input from the GP and district nurses, Marie Curie nursing, Macmillan nursing, social services, and private nursing
Outcomes Symptoms and support, GP visits, place of death, and admission to hospital
Notes UK study
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk 4:1 randomisation ratio (HAH:control) to ensure sufficient admissions to hospital at home. Random numbers from a random number table were used
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Allocation for each referral was assigned by the researcher using a random number table and concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk It was not possible for participants to be blinded to the intervention, hence there is a risk that intervention status may have biased place of death decisions. Low risk for mortality
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Response rates: 144/198 (73%) for caregivers, 225/228 (99%) district nurses, 194/228 (85%) primary care physicians
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes reported
Baseline measures Low risk Demographic data
Protection against contamination High risk Intervention was contaminated by other input available to the control group (e.g. supplemented by GP and other community care when less than 24‐hour hospital‐at‐home input was provided)