TABLE 3.

RR and 95% CIs for the Association of non–HDL-C and LDL-C Status in Youth With Carotid Artery IMT ≥90th Percentile in Adulthood Stratified by Youth Age Group (n = 4582)

	Youth Age Group, ya
	3–8			9–11			12–14			15–17			18+
	n Out of Nb	%	RR (95% CI)	n Out of Nb	%	RR (95% CI)	n Out of Nb	%	RR (95% CI)	n Out of Nb	%	RR (95% CI)	n Out of Nb	%	RR (95% CI)
Non–HDL-C
Normal	117 out of 633	18.5	Reference	54 out of 392	13.8	Reference	77 out of 627	12.3	Reference	47 out of 342	13.7	Reference	7 out of 104	6.7	Reference
Elevated	45 out of 371	12.1	0.89 (0.63–1.24)	28 out of 238	11.8	0.95 (0.61–1.49)	31 out of 240	12.9	1.27 (0.83–1.95)	25 out of 191	13.1	1.11 (0.70–1.75)	19 out of 119	16.0	2.43 (1.10–5.38)c
Dyslipidemia	68 out of 477	14.3	1.10 (0.80–1.52)	45 out of 280	16.1	1.42 (0.92–2.20)	34 out of 263	12.9	1.36 (0.91–2.03)	32 out of 177	18.1	1.72 (1.08–2.72)c	18 out of 130	13.9	2.20 (0.98–4.94)
LDL-C
Normal	116 out of 629	18.4	Reference	56 out of 398	14.1	Reference	86 out of 673	12.8	Reference	49 out of 359	13.7	Reference	10 out of 119	8.4	Reference
Elevated	34 out of 296	11.5	0.84 (0.59–1.21)	25 out of 188	13.3	1.05 (0.66–1.67)	21 out of 190	11.1	1.04 (0.65–1.66)	20 out of 169	11.8	1.08 (0.66–1.77)	19 out of 102	18.6	2.25 (1.12–4.55)c
Dyslipidemia	80 out of 556	14.4	1.15 (0.85–1.57)	46 out of 324	14.2	1.24 (0.80–1.92)	35 out of 267	13.1	1.35 (0.90–2.03)	35 out of 182	19.2	1.97 (1.24–3.15)c	15 out of 132	11.4	1.40 (0.66–2.99)

All analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, and systolic blood pressure at baseline, sex, cohort, and length of follow-up.

^aThe age when non–HDL-C or LDL-C levels were first measured in youth.

^bNumber of participants with high IMT out of all participants.

^cStatistical significance, P < .05.