Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 1;145(4):e20192114. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2114

TABLE 4.

RR and 95% CIs for the Association of non–HDL-C and LDL-C Status in Youth With Carotid Artery IMT ≥90th Percentile in Adulthood by Cohorts (n = 4582)

CDAH Bogalusa Insulin Study YFS
n Out of Na % RR (95% CI) n Out of Na % RR (95% CI) n Out of Na % RR (95% CI) n Out of Na % RR (95% CI)
NonHDL-C
 Normal 48 out of 234 20.5 Reference 177 out of 1068 16.6 Reference 34 out of 209 16.3 Reference 43 out of 586 7.3 Reference
 Elevated 20 out of 107 18.7 0.88 (0.55–1.41) 25 out of 150 16.7 0.96 (0.66–1.39) 8 out of 43 18.6 0.85 (0.38–1.87) 95 out of 859 11.1 1.51 (1.07–2.14)b
 Dyslipidemia 16 out of 60 26.7 1.21 (0.74–1.99) 11 out of 74 14.9 0.71 (0.41–1.22) 2 out of 33 6.1 0.27 (0.07–1.11) 168 out of 1159 14.5 1.92 (1.39–2.65)b
LDL-C
 Normal 51 out of 248 20.6 Reference 178 out of 1075 16.6 Reference 38 out of 234 16.2 Reference 50 out of 620 8.1 Reference
 Elevated 15 out of 85 17.7 0.85 (0.51–1.42) 23 out of 140 16.4 0.93 (0.63–1.38) 5 out of 32 15.6 0.65 (0.28–1.49) 76 out of 688 11.1 1.41 (1.00–1.97)b
 Dyslipidemia 18 out of 68 26.5 1.20 (0.74–1.93) 12 out of 77 15.6 0.75 (0.44–1.25) 1 out of 19 5.3 0.26 (0.04–1.92) 180 out of 1296 13.9 1.70 (1.26–2.29)b

All analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, and systolic blood pressure at baseline, sex, cohort, and length of follow-up.

a

Number of participants with high IMT out of all participants.

b

Statistical significance, P < .05.