Table 4.
Staff opinions about recruitment, job role, centre for disease control and prevention (CDC) evaluation and workforce outflow.
| East n (%) |
Central n (%) |
West n (%) |
Total n (%) |
P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methods of recruitment | |||||
| Compete | 136 (34.9) | 78 (20.9) | 99 (19.2) | 313 (24.4) | <0.0001 |
| Talent introduction | 20 (5.1) | 25 (6.7) | 26 (5) | 71 (5.5) | 0.5169 |
| Employment agency introduction | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (0.8) | 4 (0.3) | 0.0420 |
| Guarantee job assignment | 167 (42.8) | 190 (50.8) | 229 (44.3) | 586 (45.7) | 0.0597 |
| Other | 52 (13.3) | 61 (16.3) | 115 (22.2) | 228 (17.8) | 0.0016 |
| Description of current job role | |||||
| Yes, with detailed information about responsibilities | 242 (62.1) | 190 (50.8) | 308 (59.6) | 740 (57.8) | 0.0040 |
| Yes, with name and content | 91 (23.3) | 95 (25.4) | 111 (21.5) | 297 (23.2) | 0.3887 |
| No, only brief introduction | 33 (8.5) | 57 (15.2) | 53 (10.3) | 143 (11.2) | 0.0083 |
| No, completely depend on myself | 24 (6.2) | 32 (8.6) | 45 (8.7) | 101 (7.9) | 0.3137 |
| Evaluation standard from CDC (multiple choices) | |||||
| Quantity of work | 291 (74.6) | 264 (70.6) | 351 (67.9) | 906 (70.7) | 0.0881 |
| Quality of work | 299 (76.7) | 280 (74.9) | 389 (75.2) | 968 (75.6) | 0.8251 |
| Satisfaction with services | 176 (45.1) | 120 (32.1) | 219 (42.4) | 515 (40.2) | 0.0005 |
| Attendance | 165 (42.3) | 162 (43.3) | 247 (47.8) | 574 (44.8) | 0.2056 |
| Economic benefit | 24 (6.2) | 28 (7.5) | 59 (11.4) | 111 (8.7) | 0.0130 |
| Research achievement | 69 (17.7) | 54 (14.4) | 67 (13) | 190 (14.8) | 0.1349 |
| Budget performance | 43 (11) | 23 (6.1) | 48 (9.3) | 114 (8.9) | 0.0562 |
| Other | 10 (2.6) | 15 (4) | 25 (4.8) | 50 (3.9) | 0.2150 |
| Would you resign if a better job became available? | |||||
| Yes | 112 (28.7) | 117 (31.3) | 195 (37.7) | 424 (33.1) | 0.0116 |
| No | 193 (49.5) | 158 (42.3) | 209 (40.4) | 560 (43.7) | 0.0194 |
| Didn't answer | 85 (21.8) | 99 (26.5) | 113 (21.9) | 297 (23.2) | 0.2017 |
χ2 test, P-values in bold were statistically significant (P < 0.05).