Table 5.
Concentration of viruses detected in untreated wastewater by qPCR.
Genome copies per liter | Virus | Location | Remarks | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
51,000,000 | Norovirus GI, GII | Tucson, Arizona, United States of America | Sample collected the same day; composite sample; 24% efficiency | Schmitz et al., 2016 |
15,500,000 | Adenovirus | |||
1,100,800 | Norovirus GI, GII | Tucson, AZ, USA | 105.3% efficiency | Kitajima et al., 2014 |
5,191,200 | Adenovirus | 73.8% efficiency | ||
31,000,000 | Rotavirus | Yungas region, Bolivia | >10% efficiency | Symonds et al., 2014. |
158,000 | Norovirus GI | Kyoto, Shiga, Saitama, Osaka, Tokyo, Ibaraki, Japan | 19% efficiency | Katayama et al., 2008 |
316,227 | Adenovirus | |||
5,700,000,000 | Norovirus GII | Central Italy | 35% efficiency | La Rosa et al., 2010 |
1,600,000,000 | Norovirus GI | |||
9,800,000,000 | Adenovirus | |||
1,258,925,412 | Adenovirus | Traverse City, Michigan, USA | 1 MDS method for conc. 30–50% efficiency | Simmons et al., 2011 |
398,107,170 | Norovirus GII | |||
1,000,000,000 | Norovirus GI | Northwestern France | Composite; efficiency >10% | Da Silva et al., 2007 |
60,000,000 | Norovirus GII | |||
1,000,000,000 | Norovirus GI | Northwest France | Grab; >10% efficiency | Da Silva et al., 2008 |
39,810,717 | Norovirus GII | |||
2,200,000 | Adenovirus | Japan | Not given | Hata et al., 2012 |
510,000 | Sapovirus | |||
416,686,938 | Adenovirus | Several treatment plants across New Zealand | Beef extract flocculation –eff. Not given | Hewitt et al., 2011 |
4,677,351 | Enterovirus | |||
63,095,734 | Adenovirus | Edmonton, Canada | 30 to 50% efficiency | Qiu et al., 2015 |
19,952,623 | Reovirus | |||
10,000,000 | Norovirus | |||
10,000,000 | Sapovirus | |||
12,589,254 | Norovirus GII | New Orleans, Louisiana, USA | Composite; eff. Not provided; ultracentrifugation | Montazeri et al., 2015 |
12,589,254 | Norovirus GI |