Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;2019(1):CD001118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118.pub4

Comparison 3. Tailored self‐help vs no self‐help.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Long‐term abstinence 12 19190 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.34 [1.20, 1.49]
1.1 Tailored materials vs no materials 10 14359 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.34 [1.19, 1.51]
1.2 Tailored materials vs brief advice 2 2992 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.86, 1.49]
1.3 Tailored materials as an adjunct to advice 2 1839 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.72 [1.17, 2.53]