Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;2019(1):CD001118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118.pub4

Comparison 5. Self‐help plus NRT vs NRT alone.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Long‐term abstinence 3 1769 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.86, 1.30]
1.1 Non‐tailored materials 1 303 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.54, 1.34]
1.2 Tailored materials 2 1466 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.88, 1.41]