Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;2019(1):CD001118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118.pub4

BTS 1983.

Methods Setting: hospital chest clinics and inpatient wards, UK
 Recruitment: patients with smoking‐related conditions
Participants 748 smokers (in relevant arms), average age 49, average cpd 24
Interventions ∙ Brief advice to quit from a physician
 ∙ Advice and self‐help booklet containing information and advice
 ∙ Same as second bullet here plus placebo chewing gum (not included in this review)
 ∙ Same as second bullet here plus nicotine gum (not included in this review)
Outcomes Sustained abstinence 6 to 12 months (2 months point prevalence)
 Validation: venous carboxyhaemoglobin and thiocyanate
Notes 2 vs 1, self‐help vs control.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Centrally generated; "each physician initially received a balanced block of 12 treatments"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Numbered envelopes, opened after eligibility assessed
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Biochemical validation, but possible performance bias in that physicians handing out leaflets were not blind to treatment condition and this may have impacted advice; insufficient detail reported by which to judge
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 48 withdrawals re‐included in this analysis with no impact on effect size