Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;2019(1):CD001118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118.pub4

Davis 1984.

Methods Setting: local communities with lung associations, USA
 Recruitment: media advertisements for American Lung Association (ALA) self‐help materials
Participants 1237 smokers who completed a questionnaire and paid a refundable deposit
Interventions No face‐to‐face contact
 ∙ ALA leaflets (8 leaflets including 2 brief cessation brochures: Me Quit Smoking? Why? and Me Quit Smoking? How?)
 ∙ Leaflets and maintenance manual: A Lifetime of Freedom from Smoking
 ∙ Cessation manual: Freedom from Smoking in 20 Days.
 ∙ Cessation and maintenance manuals
Outcomes Sustained abstinence at 12 months (point prevalence at all 5 follow‐up points); self‐report in a telephone interview
 Validation: none
Notes 2 plus 3 plus 4 vs 1, self‐help vs leaflet only
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised; method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No biochemical validation used but no personal contact; interventions all of similar intensity, so differential misreport judged unlikely
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information on number lost; all randomised participants included in ITT analysis