Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;2019(1):CD001118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118.pub4

Orleans 1991.

Methods Setting: HMO, USA
 Recruitment: largely through publicity in HMO magazine
Participants 2021 smokers; 63% female, average age 44, average cpd 26
Interventions Free & Clear ‐ 28‐page guide incorporating nicotine fading and standard behavioural abstinence and relapse prevention techniques. Also, a Quit Kit and ALA publication, A Lifetime of Freedom from Smoking
 ∙ Same materials as first bullet above plus 2 copies of a social support guide to be given to "allies"
 ∙ Same materials as second bullet above plus TC plus quitline
 ∙ Control ‐ Referral guide describing available self‐help guides and local resources, plus NCI publication, Clearing the Air
Outcomes Abstinence at 16 months for over 6 months by blinded telephone interview
 Validation: saliva cotinine < 10 ng/mL, or thiocyanate < 2400 μmol/L for gum users
Notes 1 plus 2 vs 4, effect of self‐help alone (3 assessed in TC review)
 By 16 months, 59% of participants in the control group reported that they had used an additional treatment method
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised; method not stated; stratified by living alone/not; advice to quit in last 12 months/not and nicotine content of cigarette brand
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All arms included in this review received written material at similar levels of intensity. Biochemical validation in sample at 16 months
"to improve the veracity of smoking self‐report, all follow‐up questionnaires and interviews began with a reminder that the subjects might be asked for a saliva specimen for nicotine assessment, creating a sort of 'bogus pipeline'"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Loss to follow‐up 6% at 16 months; did not differ across treatment groups
Analyses based on respondents, including losses, would marginally increase estimated effect