Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;2019(1):CD001118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118.pub4

Orleans 1998.

Methods Setting: Community, USA
 Recruitment: African American smokers calling a Cancer Information Service telephone counselling line in response to a targeted campaign
Participants 1422 African American smokers; average age not stated, 62% in 20 to 39‐year age group, median cpd 20
Interventions ∙ 36‐page Pathways to Freedom guide and tailored TC. Guide used African American models and addressed specific obstacles
 ∙ Standard guide Clearing the Air and standard NCI TC
Outcomes Abstinence at 6 months, 7‐day point prevalence, telephone questionnaire (12 months' abstinence also assessed in a sample of 445 smokers)
 Validation: none
Notes Test of population targeting; counselling was also different for the 2 groups
 At 12 months, results showed significant differences (15.0% vs 8.8% for the sample selected for follow‐up)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised by last digit of caller's contact phone number; risk of bias probably low
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Presumably recruited before phone number and thus allocation known, so risk of bias probably low
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Self‐reported outcomes from participants not blinded to treatment condition; intervention includes personal contact with tailoring in one group
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 37% lost to follow‐up at 6 months
No differential dropout
Meta‐analysis includes non‐responders as smokers