Orleans 2000.
Methods | Setting: community, USA Recruitment: smokers aged > 65 using nicotine patch | |
Participants | 720 smokers; "mostly female", average age 72, average cpd 22 | |
Interventions | All participants had filled a prescription for nicotine patch ∙ Clear Horizons guide for older smokers plus 7 personalised tailored computer‐generated mailings over 6 months ∙ Fact sheet on patch‐assisted quitting | |
Outcomes | Abstinence at 12 months; 7‐day point prevalence Validation: none (limited information in abstract) | |
Notes | Follow‐up rates supplied by N Boyd Considered with other studies testing self‐help adjuncts to pharmacotherapy, not with other tailored studies "Tailored messages were based on past research identifying the factors associated with general quitting success and with patch assisted quitting among older smokers" Not based on individual characteristics |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised; method not stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Limited information in abstract; unclear if biochemical validation used |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Loss to follow‐up 21% experiment, 23% control; not significantly different Non‐responders included as smokers |