Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;2019(1):CD001118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118.pub4

Orleans 2000.

Methods Setting: community, USA
 Recruitment: smokers aged > 65 using nicotine patch
Participants 720 smokers; "mostly female", average age 72, average cpd 22
Interventions All participants had filled a prescription for nicotine patch
 ∙ Clear Horizons guide for older smokers plus 7 personalised tailored computer‐generated mailings over 6 months
 ∙ Fact sheet on patch‐assisted quitting
Outcomes Abstinence at 12 months; 7‐day point prevalence
 Validation: none (limited information in abstract)
Notes Follow‐up rates supplied by N Boyd
Considered with other studies testing self‐help adjuncts to pharmacotherapy, not with other tailored studies
"Tailored messages were based on past research identifying the factors associated with general quitting success and with patch assisted quitting among older smokers"
Not based on individual characteristics
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised; method not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Limited information in abstract; unclear if biochemical validation used
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Loss to follow‐up 21% experiment, 23% control; not significantly different
Non‐responders included as smokers