Skip to main content
. 2004 Aug 3;121(1):85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.06.006

Table 1.

Effect of formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde inactivation of SARS-CoV

Virus Dilution Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
4 °C 25 °C 37 °C 4 °C 25 °C 37 °C 4 °C 25 °C 37 °C
Formaldehyde treatment
 No 1:1000 xa x x x x x x x x
 Yes 1:1000 x x x x x x x x x
 Yes 1:4000 4.45 ± 0.25b 1.31 ± 0.29 1.31 ±0.29 4.02 ± 0.38 1.31 ± 0.29 1.5 ± 0 3.28 ± 0.14 1.14 ± 0.29 1.14 ± 0.29



Glutaraldehyde treatment
 No 1:1000 ≤1.0c ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0
 Yes 1:1000 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 ≤1.0
 Yes 1:4000 2.70 ± 0 1.31 ± 0.29 ≤1.0 2.26 ± 0.38 ≤1.0 ≤1.0 2.19 ± 0.25 ≤1.0 ≤1.0
 Yes No 5.28 ± 0.29 5.09 ± 0.58 4.03 ± 0.14 5.03 ± 0.14 4.86 ± 0.29 3.36 ± 0.29 5.12 ± 0.14 4.1 ± 0.52 2.78 ± 0.14
a

Formaldehyde treatment fixed the cells in the TCID50 assay so virus could not be detected.

b

Geometric mean of triplicate samples ± S.D.

c

The limit of detection for the TCID50 assay is ≤1.0.