Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2020 Mar;27(3):255–262. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001472

Table 3.

Effect modifications of treatment on the association between 48-months changes in each heart fat depot and 48-months changes in CIMT

48-months Δ CIMT
48-months Δ EAT 48-months Δ PAT
β (95% CI) P-valuea β (95% CI) P-valuea
Model 1
Per 1 SD increase in 48-months Δ heart fatb
 o-CEE ------ ----- ----- -----
 t-E2 7.23 (−3.03,17.48) 0.17 14.28 (3.67,24.90) 0.009
 Placebo 5.01 (−4.14,14.17) 0.28 12.11 (3.06,21.16) 0.009
P-value for interaction
48-months Δ heart fat depot * treatment group 0.34 0.009
Model 2
Per 1 SD increase in 48-months Δ heart fatb
 o-CEE ----- ----- ----- -----
 t-E2 6.77 (−3.67,17.20) 0.20 12.54 (1.75,23.34) 0.02
 Placebo 4.61 (−4.75,13.97) 0.33 10.00 (0.75,19.25) 0.03
P-value for interaction
48-months Δ heart fat depot * treatment group 0.41 0.04
Model 3
Per 1 SD increase in 48-months Δ heart fatb
 o-CEE ---- ----- ---- -----
 t-E2 6.83 (−3.62,17.29) 0.20 12.66 (1.80, 23.52) 0.02
 Placebo 4.64 (−4.73,14.02) 0.33 10.09 (0.79, 19.39) 0.03
P-value for interaction
48-months Δ heart fat depot * treatment group 0.40 0.04
a

P value of each treatment group compared to o-CEE

b

Estimates per 1 SD increase in heart fat depot change (SD for EAT change=15.47; for PAT change=7.79)

Model 1. Unadjusted

Model 2. includes age, race (white v/s non-white), location of study site (east, west and middle), employment, LDL-C, BMI, alcohol, smoking, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication, log-triglycerides, log-HOMA, log-C-reactive protein, log-Leptin, log-high molecular weight adiponectin

Mode 3. Model 2 plus log transformed baseline heart fat depot volume as appropriate