Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb 12;72(4):658–666. doi: 10.1002/art.41144

Table 3.

Multivariable negative binomial regression models for the association of baseline SLICC-FI and SDI scores with the change in SDI score during follow-up among SLE patients in the SLICC inception cohort.

Univariable model
(n = 1549)
Multivariable model a
(n = 1539)

Incidence Rate
Ratio (95% CI)
p value Incidence Rate
Ratio (95% CI)
p value
Model 1: SLICC-FI
 SLICC-FI (per 0.05) 1.26 (1.20 – 1.33) <0.001 1.20 (1.14 – 1.27) <0.001
Model 2: SDI
 SDI (per 1.0) 1.31 (1.20 – 1.43) <0.001 1.17 (1.07 – 1.28) <0.001
Model 3: SLICC-FI & SDI
 SLICC-FI (per 0.05) 1.23 (1.17 – 1.30) <0.001 1.19 (1.13 – 1.25) <0.001
 SDI (per 1.0) 1.19 (1.09 – 1.31) <0.001 1.10 (1.01 – 1.21) 0.038

Overall model comparisons LR test statistic p value LR test statistic p value
 Model 1 vs. Model 3 15.35 <0.001 5.18 0.023
 Model 2 vs. Model 3 67.64 <0.001 40.49 <0.001

Akaike information criteria (AIC)
 Model 1: SLICC-FI 3735.12 3566.78
 Model 2: SDI 3787.41 3602.09
 Model 3: SLICC-FI & SDI 3721.78 3563.60
a

Models adjusted for the following baseline characteristics: age, sex, steroid use, antimalarial use, immunosuppressive use, ethnicity/location, post-secondary education, and SLEDAI-2K.

Notes: SLICC = Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics; FI = Frailty Index; SDI = SLICC / ACR Damage Index; LR = Likelihood Ratio