Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;69(4):559–568. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02478-7

Table 3.

Odds of occult sentinel lymph node metastasis

Univariable OR (95% CI) p value Adjusteda OR (95% CI) p value
NLR ≥ 2.3 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) 0.3 1.3 (1.3, 1.3) < 0.001
Angiolymphatic invasion 4.1 (2.0, 8.4) < 0.001 3.5 (1.9, 6.2) < 0.001
Microsatellites 2.8 (1.3, 5.9) 0.008 1.7 (1.4, 2.0) < 0.001
Mitoses per mm2 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 0.001 1.1 (1.1, 1.1) < 0.001
Breslow thickness (mm) 1.1 (1.1, 1.2) < 0.001 1.1 (1.1, 1.2) < 0.001
Age in years 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.010 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) < 0.001
Male 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 0.9 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 0.7
Ulceration 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) 0.4 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 0.8
Regression 0.8 (0.5, 1.4) 0.5 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) 0.5
Anatomical location
 Head and neck 1 (referent) 0.002 1 (referent) 0.01
 Upper limb 1.5 (0.9, 2.7) 1.5 (0.6, 3.5)
 Lower limb 2.3 (2.3, 4.0) 1.8 (0.9, 3.6)
 Trunk and genitals 2.4 (0.9, 2.7) 2.5 (1.2, 5.0)
TILs
 Absent 1 (referent) < 0.001 1 (referent) < 0.001
 Non-brisk 0.7 (0.4, 1.1) 0.6 (0.6, 0.6)
 Brisk 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) 0.2 (0.2, 0.3)

CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, TILs tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes

aMixed-effects logistic regression with random-effects varying by the hospital cluster