Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 1;10:5768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62647-y

Table 2.

Individualized genotype in postlingually deafened cochlear implantees.

Subject Gene HGVS nucleotide: protein change REVELa In silico computational GERPf Variant frequencies Zygosity Inheritance MGT
CADDb MTc SIFTd PP-2e KRGDBg (1722 individuals) GMAFh
SB358–699 ACTG1 [NM_001199954.1] c.1013 C > T:p.Ser338Leu 0.883 25.6 DC Not predicted 0.999 (D) 3.07 ND ND Het AD WES
SH191–430 ATP1A3 [NM_001256214] c.2491 G > A:p.Glu831Lys 0.967 26.5 DC 0.0 (D) 1.0 (D) 3.88 ND ND Het de-novo AD WES
SH222–518 ATP1A3 [NM_001256214] c.2491 G > A:p.Glu831Lys 0.967 26.5 DC 0.0 (D) 1.0 (D) 3.88 ND ND Het de-novo AD WES
SB116–208* CDH23 [NM_022124.5] c.719 C > T:p.Pro240Leu 0.516 25.8 DC 0.001(D) 0.704 (PD) 5.19 T = 0.001455/5

T = 0.00004 (10/249236, GnomAD exome)

T = 0.00009 (11/120716, ExAC)

T = 0.000 (1/5008, 1000 G)

Comp het AR D130
[NM_022124.5] c.5996 C > G:p.Thr1999Ser 0.086 14.01 N Not predicted 0.0 (B) 4.14 G = 0.168899/582

G = 0.42292 (104457/246988, GnomAD_exome)

G = 0.42914 (51084/119038, ExAC)

G = 0.345 (1729/5008, 1000 G)

SH62–147 CDH23 [NM_022124.5] c.6604 G > A:p.Asp2202Asn 0.732 18.84 DC Not predicted 1.0 (D) 5.06 ND A = 0.00002 (3/125568, TOPMED) Comp het AR D200
[NM_022124.5] c.5747 G > A:p.Arg1916His 0.736 25 DC Not predicted 1.0 (D) 4.28 A = 0.001747/6

A = 0.00003 (7/237774, GnomAD_exome)

A = 0.00001 (1/125568, TOPMED)

A = 0.0001 (4/67492, ExAC)

SB200–388 COCH [NM_001135058.1] c.113 G > A:p.Gly38Asp 0.721 27.9 DC 0.004 (D) 0.997 (D) 5.67 ND ND Het AD TES
SH14–37 COCH [NM_001135058.1] c.113 G > A:p.Gly38Asp 0.721 27.9 DC 0.004 (D) 0.997 (D) 5.67 ND ND Het AD D80
SH185–419 GJB2 [NM_004004.5] c.235del:p.Leu79Cysfs*3 NA 32 DC NA NA del = 0.005807/20

del = 0.00036 (44/121376, ExAC)

del = 0.0005 (15/30968, GnomAD)

del = 0.002 (8/5008, 1000 G)

Comp het AR Sanger sequencing
[NM_004004.5] c.578 T > A:p.Val193Glu 0.868 25.5 DC 0.002 (D) 0.979 (D) 5.65 ND ND
SH64–149 ILDR1 [NM_001199799.1] c.206 C > A: pPro69His 0.792 26.9 DC 0.023 (D) 1.0 (D) 5.64 ND

T = 0.00003 (7/251074, GnomAD_exome)

T = 0.00006 (7/125568, TOPMED)

T = 0.00004 (5/116010, ExAC)

Homo AR D200
SH53–118 MYO7A [NM_000260.3] c.2254 C > T:p.Gln752Ter NA 41 DC NA NA 5.03 ND ND Het Possibly de-novo AD D80, D200, WES
SB224–437 MYO15A [NM_016239.3] c.9790 C > T:p.Gln3264Ter NA 51 DC NA NA 5.61 ND ND Comp het AR TES
[NM_016239.3] c.10263 C > G:p.Ile3421Met 0.582 23.1 DC 0.032 (D) 0.905 (D) 2.74 G = 0.000874/3

G = 0.00003 (7/249476, GnomAD_exome)

G = 0.00003 (4/120692, ExAC)

SB181–344 NF2 [NM_000268.3] c.932_935del: p.Arg311Lysfs*10 NA DC NA NA ND ND Het AD Sanger sequencing
SH41–90 NLRP3 [NM_001243133.1] c.1043 C > T: p.Thr348Met 0.776 28.8 DC 0.055 (T) 0.999 (D) 3.84 ND ND Het de-novo AD D80, D200, WES
SB114–206 SERPINB6 [NM_001271822.2] c.928del: p.Glu310Serfs*43 NA DC NA NA 4.21 ND ND Compound het AR WES
[NM_001271822.2] c.772-1 G > A NA 31 DC NA NA 4.67 ND T = 0.0000 (1/31404, GnomAD)
SH100–214 SLC26A4 [NM_000441.2] c.919-2 A > G NA 24.8 DC NA NA 5.62 G = 0.000873/3

G = 0.00036 (90/251010, GnomAD_exome)

G = 0.00052 (65/125568, TOPMED)

G = 0.00031 (37/121000, ExAC)

Comp het AR Sanger sequencing
[NM_000441.2] c.2168 A > G:p.His723Arg 0.933 26.8 DC 0.001 (D) 1.0 (D) 5.51 G = 0.005824/20

G = 0.00012 (30/251294, GnomAD_exome)

G = 0.00006 (8/125568, TOPMED)

G = 0.00012 (15/121166, ExAC)

G = 0.000 (2/5008, 1000 G)

SH24–53 SLC26A4 [NM_000441.2] c.916dup: p.Val306Glyfs*24 NA 35 DC NA NA ND

dupG = 0.00001 (3/251278, GnomAD_exome)

dupG = 0.00002 (2/121236, ExAC)

Comp het AR Sanger sequencing
[NM_000441.2] c.2168 A > G:p.His723Arg 0.933 26.8 DC 0.001 (D) 1.0 (D) 5.51 G = 0.005824/20

G = 0.00012 (30/251294, GnomAD_exome)

G = 0.00006 (8/125568, TOPMED)

G = 0.00012 (15/121166, ExAC)

G = 0.000 (2/5008, 1000 G)

SB144–238 TMC1 [NM_138691.2] c.1714G > A:p.Asp572Asn 0.465 29.7 DC 0.122 (T) 0.999 (D) 6.16 ND ND Het AD D80, WES
SB144–239 TMC1 [NM_138691.2] c.1714G > A:p.Asp572Asn 0.465 29.7 DC 0.122 (T) 0.999 (D) 6.16 ND ND Het AD D80, WES
SB279–550 TMC1 [NM_138691.2] c.1714G > A:p.Asp572Asn 0.465 29.7 DC 0.122 (T) 0.999 (D) 6.16 ND ND Het AD WES
SH174–387 TMPRSS3 [NM_024022.2] c.346 G > A:p.Val116Met 0.695 28.1 DC 0.026 (D) 1.0 (D) 4.94 ND

T = 0.00005 (13/251420, GnomAD_exome)

T = 0.00003 (4/125568, TOPMED)

T = 0.00006 (7/121402, ExAC)

Homo AR D130
SH51–112 TMPRSS3 [NM_024022.2] c.916 G > A:p.Ala306Thr 0.851 34 DC 0.002 (D) 0.999 (D) 4.8 T = 0.001164/4

T = 0.00014 (36/249060, GnomAD_exome)

T = 0.00012 (15/125568, TOPMED)

T = 0.00017 (21/121412, ExAC)

T = 0.000 (1/5008, 1000 G)

Comp het AR D80, D200, WES
[NM_024022.2] c.325 C > T:p.Arg109Trp 0.767 28.4 DC 0.0 (D) 1.0 (D) 3.99 A = 0.000588/2

A = 0.00013 (33/251350, GnomAD_exome)

A = 0.00010 (13/125568, TOPMED)

A = 0.00010 (12/121392, ExAC)

HGVS, human genome variation society; Homo, homozygosity; Comp Het, compound heterozygosity; Het, heterozygosity; DC, disease causing; D, deleterious; N, neutral; B, benign; NA, not available; ND, not determined; WES: whole exome sequencing; TES: targeted exome sequencing; D80, D130, and D200: Deafness panel comprising 80 genes, 130 genes and 200 genes, respectively.

aRare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner (REVEL; https://sites.google.com/site/revelgenomics/about).

bCombined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD; https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/).

cMutation taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/).

dSorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT; http://sift.jcvi.org/).

ePolyPhen-2 (PP2) prediction score (HumanVar), ranges from 0 to 1 (0 = benign, 1 = probably damaging http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/).

fGenomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP++; http://genome.ucsc.edu/).

gKorean reference genomic database (KRGDB; http://coda.nih.go.kr/coda/KRGDB/index.jsp).

hGlobal minor allele frequency.

Exome Aggregation Consortium databases (ExAC; http://exac.broadinstitute.org/).

Genome Aggregation Database (GnomAD; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/),.

NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed; https://bravo.sph.umich.edu/freeze3a/hg19/),.

1000 Genomes Project (1000 G; http://grch37.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Info/Index).

*The causal relationship between CDH23 alteration and Postlingual SNHL in SB116 was previously described (Kim et al.)8.