TABLE 3.
Performance of the survival prediction models based on Clinical Characteristics and 24 HLA-Class I, II Superalleles implemented using various regression techniques.
| Method | Feature Set-1 | Feature Set-2 | ||
| All Features | ||||
| HR | P-value | HR | P-value | |
| LASSO | 3.17 | 3.50E-11 | 4.05 | 4.01E-13 |
| RIDGE | 3.01 | 1.76E-10 | 3.80 | 2.30E-12 |
| RF | 3.09 | 2.87E-11 | 3.77 | 8.15E-12 |
| DT | 2.25 | 6.93E-07 | 2.00 | 5.29E-05 |
| Clinical features without tumor status | ||||
| LASSO | 3.50 | 3.93E-13 | 3.46 | 1.54E-11 |
| RIDGE | 3.49 | 3.93E-13 | 2.97 | 2.89E-09 |
| RF | 3.74 | 3.01E-14 | 2.96 | 8.23E-10 |
| DT | 2.15 | 2.24E-06 | 1.83 | 3.12E-04 |
| Clinical features without tumor stage | ||||
| LASSO | 2.80 | 9.96E-10 | 3.51 | 1.32E-11 |
| RIDGE | 2.43 | 4.68E-08 | 3.55 | 7.56E-12 |
| RF | 2.81 | 2.05E-10 | 3.18 | 2.14E-10 |
| DT | 2.50 | 1.64E-08 | 2.76 | 2.38E-09 |
| Clinical features without tumor stage and tumor status | ||||
| LASSO | 2.40 | 4.41E-08 | 3.11 | 5.60E-10 |
| RIDGE | 2.40 | 4.41E-08 | 2.57 | 5.81E-08 |
| RF | 2.99 | 9.37E-12 | 2.59 | 1.55E-08 |
| DT | 2.54 | 1.06E-08 | 2.65 | 7.37E-09 |
#HR: Hazard Ratio; RF: Random Forest; DT: Decision Tree; Feature Set-1: Clinical and demographic features, Feature Set-2: Clinical, demographic and 24 HLA superalleles features.