Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;24:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.001

Table 5.

Multinomial logit models.

FITN vs NFIT OR p value 95% CI
Age 1.05 0.093 0.99 to 1.12
Sex 0.28* 0.008 0.11 to 0.72
TSPAN8 0.37 0.000 0.26 to 0.51
LGALS4 2.16 0.001 1.38 to 3.36
CEACAM6 1.35 0.142 0.90 to 2.01



FITN vs LR OR p value 95% CI

Age 1.11 0.000 1.05 to 1.18
Sex 0.52* 0.139 0.22 to 1.24
TSPAN8 0.39 0.000 0.28 to 0.53
LGALS4 1.47 0.099 0.93 to 2.34
CEACAM6 0.93 0.666 0.65 to 1.31



FITN vs HR/CRC OR p value 95% CI

Age 1.18 0.000 1.12–1.24
Sex 0.64* 0.221 0.31 to 1.31
TSPAN8 0.37 0.000 0.28 to 0.49
LGALS4 0.87 0.502 0.58 to 1.30
CEACAM6 0.94 0.687 0.71 to 1.26

CEACAM6, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell-adhesion molecule 6; LGALS4, lectin galactoside-binding soluble 4; TSPAN8, tetraspanin 8; OR, odds ratio; CI confidence intervals. FITN, faecal immunochemical test negative; NFIT, negative colonoscopy positive faecal immunochemical test; LR, low risk; HR/CRC, high risk - colorectal carcinoma.

*The reference group for sex is female.