Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 13;195:194–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.08.035

Table 2.

Quantity and proportion of sequence reads with a positive BLASTN hit against the model organism groups used in the virus discovery metagenomic dataset, comparing the effect of different virus enrichment methods.

Treatment Total number of sequence readsa Metazoa
Enterobacteriaceae
Adenovirus
Influenza
Enterovirus
BLASTN hits % total BLASTN hits % total BLASTN hits % total BLASTN hits % total BLASTN hits % total
No treatment 1,980,878 39,481 1.99% 1,523,514 76.9% 40 0.002% 20 0.001% 3,221 0.16%
Centrifuge 2,010,717 48,719 2.42% 1,486,125 73.9% 0 0.000% 77 0.004% 14,805 0.74%
Filtration 1,941,626 65,746 3.39% 1,334,433 68.7% 6 0.000% 110 0.006% 22,731 1.17%
Nuclease 1,821,828 5,148 0.28% 1,421,268 78.0% 17 0.001% 14 0.001% 2,532 0.14%
2-step treatmentb 1,730,569 53,421 3.09% 1,199,232 69.3% 14 0.001% 57 0.003% 18,712 1.08%
3-step treatmentb 1,417,803 26,856 1.89% 857,873 60.5% 16 0.001% 161 0.011% 67,227 4.74%
a

Combined total number of sequence reads for two independent physical replicates which were also run on different Illumina MiSeq flowcells. This figure represents the collapsed sequencing data, therefore redundant reads are not represented more than once.

b

Serial applications of treatment methods. The 2-step method consisted of centrifugation then filtration. The 3-step method consisted of centrifugation, filtration then nuclease-treatment.