Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;265:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.12.013

Table 3.

Comparison of Respanel against FTDRP21 with 113 respiratory samples.

Organism TP FP TN FN Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%)
Adenovirus 7 0 106 0 100 100 100 100 100
Human Metapneumovirus 2 0 110 1 67 100 100 99 99
Influenza A 4 0 108 1 80 100 100 99 99
Influenza B 3 0 110 0 100 100 100 100 100
Parainfluenza virus 1 3 0 110 0 100 100 100 100 100
Parainfluenza virus 2 2 0 111 0 100 100 100 100 100
Parainfluenza virus 3 5 0 107 1 83 100 100 99 99
Respiratory Syncytial Virus 8 0 105 0 100 100 100 100 100
Enterovirus 3 1 108 1 75 99 75 99 98
Rhinovirus 18 1 91 3 86 99 95 97 96
Bocavirus 3 1 108 1 75 99 75 99 98
Coronavirus 229E 3 0 109 1 75 100 100 99 99
Coronavirus OC43 3 0 110 0 100 100 100 100 100
Coronavirus NL63 4 1 108 0 100 99 80 100 99
Coronavirus HKU1 1 1 111 0 100 99 50 100 99
Mycoplasma pneumoniae 3 1 108 1 75 99 75 99 98
Chlamydophila pneumoniae 0 0 113 0 100 100 100

TP = True positive, FP = False positive, TN = True negative, FN = False negative, PPV = Positive predictive value, NPV = Negative predictive value. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were calculated as defined in the materials and methods (Section 2.6).