Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e201917. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1917

Table 3. Rate Ratios for Being in the Top 5% of Health Care Users in the Last Year of Life, Among All Adult Decedents in Ontario, 2005 to 2013a.

Variable All Men Women
RR (95% CI) P value RR (95% CI) P value RR (95% CI) P value
Sexb
Men 1 [Reference] NA NA NA NA NA
Women 0.90 (0.88-0.91) <.001 NA NA NA NA
Ageb
18-24 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA
25-34 0.78 (0.68-0.89) <.001 0.81 (0.68-0.97) .02 0.74 (0.61-0.90) .002
35-44 0.73 (0.65-0.82) <.001 0.68 (0.57-0.79) <.001 0.78 (0.66-0.93) .004
45-54 0.63 (0.57-0.71) <.001 0.62 (0.53-0.72) <.001 0.65 (0.55-0.76) <.001
55-64 0.60 (0.54-0.67) <.001 0.61 (0.52-0.70) <.001 0.60 (0.51-0.70) <.001
65-74 0.52 (0.46-0.57) <.001 0.53 (0.46-0.61) <.001 0.50 (0.43-0.59) <.001
75-85 0.36 (0.32-0.40) <.001 0.38 (0.33-0.44) <.001 0.33 (0.29-0.39) <.001
>85 0.21 (0.19-0.23) <.001 0.26 (0.22-0.30) <.001 0.17 (0.15-0.20) <.001
Area income quintileb
1, lowest 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA
2 1.04 (1.01-1.06) <.001 1.02 (0.99-1.06) .22 1.05 (1.01-1.09) .01
3 0.97 (0.94-1.00) .03 0.97 (0.93-1.00) .08 0.97 (0.93-1.01) .16
4 0.98 (0.96-1.01) .20 0.99 (0.95-1.03) .52 0.97 (0.93-1.01) .16
5, highest 1.02 (0.99-1.05) .18 1.04 (1.00-1.08) .03 0.98 (0.94-1.03) .42
Missing 1.46 (1.32-1.62) <.001 1.67 (1.47-1.90) <.001 1.17 (0.96-1.40) .10
ADG score, per 1-unit increaseb 1.27 (1.27-1.28) <.001 1.28 (1.27-1.28) <.001 1.27 (1.26-1.27) <.001

Abbreviations: ADG, Aggregated Diagnosis Group; NA, not applicable; RR, rate ratio.

a

Rate ratios were calculated using modified Poisson model.

b

Likelihood ratio P values for the overall variables in type 3 analysis where P < .001.