Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;262:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.09.003

Table 2.

Assessment of field samples by the conventional and colorimetric V/ N assays*.

Sample Replicate 1
Replicate 2
Colorimetric Conventional Colorimetric Conventional
1 1:32 1:16 1:32 1:16
2 1:16 1:16 1:16 1:16
3 1:8 1:8 1:16 1:16
4 1:64 1:64 1:128 1:128
5 1:64 1:64 1:64 1:64
6 1:32 1:32 1:64 1:64
7 1:16 1:16 1:8 1:8
8 1:8 1:8 1:8 1:8
9 1:32 1:32 1:32 1:32
10 1:64 1:64 1:64 1:64
11 1:8 1:8 1:16 1:8
12 1:16 1:8 1:8 1:8
13 1:32 1:32 1:32 1:32
14 1:16 1:16 1:16 1:16
15 1:32 1:32 1:16 1:16
16 1:128 1:128 1:64 1:128
17 1:128 1:128 1:64 1:128
18 1:64 1:64 1:64 1:64
19 1:128 1:128 1:128 1:128
20 1:32 1:32 1:32 1:32
21 1:32 1:32 1:32 1:32
22 1:64 1:32 1:32 1:32
23 1:256 1:128 1:128 1:128
24 1:128 1:128 1:128 1:128
25 1:64 1:64 1:64 1:64
26 1:128 1:128 1:128 1:128
27 1:256 1:256 1:256 1:256
28 1:64 1:64 1:128 1:128
29 1:128 1:128 1:128 1:128
30 1:64 1:64 1:128 1:128
31 1:256 1:256 1:256 1:256
32 1:256 1:256 1:256 1:256
33 1:256 1:256 1:256 1:256
34 1:512 1:512 1:1024 1:1024
35 1:32 1:16 1:32 1:32
*

A cut-off value of ≤0.53 was used to distinguish between positive and negative wells.