Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;5(12):6240–6249. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02133

Table 4. Evaluation of Various Catalysts for the Synthesis of N-Amino-2-pyridones in Comparison with MIL-101(Cr)-N(CH2PO3H2)2 in Ethanol under Reflux Conditions.

entry catalyst amount of catalyst (mol %) time (min) yield (%)
1 MIL-101(Cr)-N(CH2PO3H2)2 5 mg 20 92
2 MIL-101(Cr)-NH2 5 mg 60 24
3 [Py-SO3H]Cl51 10 35 82
4 Fe3O4@SiO2@PrNH252 5 mg 60 25
5 SSA53 10 25 85
6 TrBr 15 60 65
7 p-TSA 10 45 65
8 nano-SB-[PSIM]Cl54 10 35 78
9 TrCl 10 45 72
10 GTBSA55 10 30 85
11 [Fe3O4@SiO2@Pr-DABCO-SO3H]Cl256 10 mg 35 82
12 FeCl3 10 50 75
13 Al(HSO4)3 10 45 75
14 H3[p(W3O10)4xH2O 15 60 75
15 Fe3O4 10 mg 55 68
16 trichloroisocyanuric acid 10 55 70
17 Et3N 20 60 trace
18 NaHSO4 10 60 35
19 H3PO3 10 20 75
20 H3PO3 + MIL-101(Cr)-NH2 5 + 5 20 90 and without recycling