Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 23;133(1):74–87. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.03.012

Table 3.

Detection of prevalence of antibodies and RNAs of SARS-CoV-like viruses in bats and genome identity between bat SL-CoVs and SARS-CoV

Sampling location Bat species Antibody test positive/total (%) RT-PCRa positive/total (%) Genome size (nt) Identity with SARS-CoV (%)
Guangxi Rousettus leschenaulti 1/142 (1.4%)b 0/165
Rhinolophus pearsoni 13/46 (28.3%)b 3/30 (10%) 29,736 92
Rhinolophus pussilus 2/6 (33.3%)b 0/6



Guangdong Rousettus leschenaulti 0/42b 0/45
Cynopterus sphinx 0/17b 0/27



Tianjin Myotis ricketti ND 0/21



Hubei R. pussilus ND 0/15
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum 0/4b 1/8 (12.5%) 29,743 87
Rhinolophus macrotis 5/7 (71%)b 1/8 (12.5%) 29,749 87
Nyctalus plancyi 0/1b 0/1
Miniopterus schreibersi 0/1b 0/1
Myotis altarium 0/1b 0/1



Hong Kong Hipposideros armiger ND 0/12
Miniopterus magnater ND 0/23
Miniopterus pusillus ND 0/24
Myotis chinensis ND 0/3
M. ricketti ND 0/2
Nyctalus noctula ND 0/2
Rhinolophus affinus ND 0/2
Rhinolophus sinicus 12/18 (67%)c 23/59 (39%) 29,709 88

Modified according to Lau et al. (2005) and Li et al. (2005b). ND, not done.

a

Sandwich ELISA based on SARS-CoV N protein (Li et al., 2005b).

b

Western blot with recombinant N protein of bat SL-CoV (Lau et al., 2005).

c

Faecal swabs were used for RT-PCR.