. 2020 Mar 17;5(12):6545–6555. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04228

Table 3. T_2, peak Values for T_E = 0.1 and 2 ms, Relative Differences in Percentage, NMR Porosity Values Calculated at T_E = 0.1 and 2 ms along Accompanied by the Percentage Difference, and the Average Internal Gradient Values.

sample	Kentucky 1	Kentucky 1	Bandera Brown 1	Bandera Brown 2	Berea 1	Berea 2	Indiana limest.
T_{2, peak@T_E = 0.1ms} (ms)	29.94	34.65	46.42	31.05	193.07	215.44	537.23
T_{2, peak@T_E = 2ms} (ms)	10.37	8.03	2.99	4.48	86.4	124.52	464.16
max. relative diff. (%)	65.35	76.82	93.55	85.59	55.25	42.2	13.6
ϕ_{NMR@T_E = 0.1ms} (%)	13.02	17.83	22.81	28.21	21.07	22.43	17.81
ϕ_{NMR@T_E = 2ms} (%)	10.54	13.83	15.22	19.79	19.27	19.72	17.21
relative error (%)	19.05	22.43	33.27	29.85	8.54	12.08	3.37
avg. int. grad. (G/cm)	283	313	478	460	60	82	N/A

Table 3. T2, peak Values for TE = 0.1 and 2 ms, Relative Differences in Percentage, NMR Porosity Values Calculated at TE = 0.1 and 2 ms along Accompanied by the Percentage Difference, and the Average Internal Gradient Values.