Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;5(12):6651–6660. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04438

Table 3. Comparison of the Performances of PPy/MLS and other Adsorbents for Removing Cr(VI) at 25 °C.

adsorbents Qm (mg/g) equilibrium time (min) optimum pH references
PPy-polyaniline nanofibers 227–294 30–180 2.0 Bhaumik50
PPy/cellulose composite 130 60 4.8 Lei58
PPy/wood sawdust 3.4 15 5.0 Ansari59
PPy/graphene oxide composite 497.1 1440 3.0 Li57
PAN/PPy core/shell mats 61.8 60 2.0 Wang52
PPy-organically modified montmorillonite clay nanocomposite 119.3 180 2.0 Setshedi56
surfactant-modified zeolite 5.07 180 6.0 Ramos60
PPy/MLS 343.64 160 2.0 [Present study]