Table 5.
Summary of kinetic constants obtained cited in the literature with the present study.
| Name of Model | Reactor Type | Substrate/waste water | Influent COD concentration (mg/L) | HRT (days) | Obtained kinetic constants values |
References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y, g/g | kd,d−1 | Ks, mg COD/L | K, d−1 | ||||||
| Monod |
AH | Petrochemical Waste | 1000–4000 | 0.17–2 | 0.132 | 0.121 | 1116 | 0.487 | (Jafarzadeh Mehrdadi and Hashemian, 2009) |
| UASB | Brewery waste water | 1000–3000 | 0.3–6.5 | 0.882 | 0.083 | 0.046 | - | (Enitan and Adeyemo, 2014) | |
| CSTR | Volatile fatty acid mixture | - | - | 0.03 | 0.099 | - | 17 | (Alphenaar, 1994) | |
| ABR | Dairy waste water | 20,000–34,000 | 10.5–20 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 1310 | 0.20 | (Shoba, 2009) | |
| UASB | Synthetic waste water | 300–400 mg/L | 0.13–0.33 | 0.083 | 0.006 | 226.1 | 0.699 | (Bhunia and Ghangrekar, 2008). | |
| AnFFBR UAnFFBR |
Diethyl phthalate | 300–700 | 0.5–1.5 | 0.156–0.146 | 0.107–0.1 | 31.34 24.87 |
1.13 1.03 |
(2017) | |
| UAF |
Synthetic rubber waste water |
6355–6375 |
5–17 |
0.0297 |
0.1705 |
84.1 |
0.371 |
Present study |
|
| Umax, g/L/d | KB, g/L/d | ||||||||
| Stover Kincannon |
UAF | Simulated fruit canning waste water | 9000–11600 | 0.5 | 109.9 | 109.7 | (Rajagopal et al., 2013) | ||
| UAF | Cheese dairy waste water | 23000–40000 | 1.6 | 53.5 | 49.7 | (Rajagopal et al., 2013) | |||
| UAFB | Textile waste water | 1800–3800 | 0.4–1 | 31.69 | 45.37 | (Sandhya and Swaminathan, 2006) | |||
| Mesophilic AF | Simulated starch | - | 0.25–1 | 49.8 | 50.6 | (Ahn and Foster, 2000) | |||
| MACR | Potato processing waste water | 5200–5700 | 1.06–5.11 | 22.93 | 23.59 | (Sentürk et al., 2010) | |||
| UAFB | Formaldehyde containing waste water | 10 976–11 840 | 0.4–1 | 3.4 | 4.6 | (Raja Priya et al., 2009) | |||
| UAFB | Synthetic rubber waste water | 6355–6375 | 5–17 | 6.57 | 6.31 | Present study | |||
| k2(s), d−1 | ab | ||||||||
| Second Order | UAFB | Formaldehyde containing waste water | 10 976–11 840 | 0.4–1 | 3.2 h-1 | 0.64 | 9.36 | (Raja Priya et al., 2009) | |
| UAF | Simulated fruit canning waste water | 9000–11600 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 0.08 | 1.0 | (Rajagopal et al., 2013) | ||
| UAF | Cheese dairy waste water | 23000–40000 | 1.6 | 1.93 | 0.56 | 0.92 | (Rajagopal et al., 2013) | ||
| UAFB | Textile waste water | 1800–3800 | 0.4–1 | 10.50 h-1 | 0.9151 | 5.1386 | (Sandhya and Swaminathan, 2006) | ||
| UAFB | Synthetic rubber waste water | 6355–6375 | 5–17 | 105 | 0.918 | 0.962 | Present study | ||
∗ AH - Anaerobic hybrid, UASB – Upflow sludge blanket, ABR – Anaerobic baffle reactor, CSTR – Continuous stirred tank reactor, UAF – Upflow anaerobic filter, UAFB – Upflow anaerobic fixed film, MACR Mesophilic anaerobic contact reactor.