Table 1.
Participant demographics at baseline (n=35) and follow-up (n=20)
| Participant characteristic | Baseline n (%) | Follow-up n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| Mean | 42 | 40 |
| Range | 21–57 years | 27–50 years |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Indigenous | 18 (51.5%) | 12 (60.0%) |
| White | 15 (42.8%) | 7 (35.0%) |
| Other (Black, Asian, multiracial) | 2 (5.7%) | 1 (5.0%) |
| Gender | ||
| Cisgender | 32 (91.4%) | 17 (85.0%) |
| Transgender, two-spirit1, non-binary | 3 (8.6%) | 3 (15.0%) |
| In a relationship | ||
| Yes | 21 (60.0%) | 11 (55.0%) |
| No | 14 (40.0%) | 9 (45.0%) |
| SRA housing type | ||
| Non-profit | 19 (54.3%) | 13 (65.0%) |
| Privately-operated | 9 (25.7%) | 2 (10.0%) |
| Privately-owned, non-profit-operated | 7 (20.0%) | 2 (10.0%) |
| Unhoused2 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (15.0%) |
| Overdoses3 | In past year | In previous 6 months |
| None | 18 (51.4%) | 18 (90.0%) |
| One | 8 (22.8%) | 1 (5.0%) |
| Two | 2 (5.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Three or more (range: 3 – 10 overdoses) | 7 (20.0%) | 1 (5.0%) |
| Integrated harm reduction services in SRA | ||
| HOPS and harm reduction supplies | 17 (48.6%) | 9 (45.0%) |
| Harm reduction supplies only | 4 (11.4%) | 5 (25.0%) |
| No harm reduction supplies | 14 (40.0%) | 3 (15.0%) |
| N/A4 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (15.0%) |
| Ever utilized HOPS5 | ||
| Yes – for consumption | 6 (17.1%) | 6 (30.0%) |
| Yes – for harm reduction supplies only | 1 (2.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| No | 10 (28.6%) | 4 (20.0%) |
| N/A | 18 (51.4%) | 10 (50.0%) |
A non-binary, fluid term denoting Indigenous persons with both feminine and masculine spirits; used to describe sexuality or gender (Ristock et al., 2010).
Participants reported staying at shelters, with friends in non-profit operated SRAs, and sleeping outside.
Indigenous participants reported a total of 34 overdoses within the last year at baseline, compared to 14 overdoses among non-Indigenous participants.
Includes unhoused participants at follow-up.
All participants described their HOPS utilization as a singular event or sporadic; no one reported regular use.