Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019 Nov 22;59(2):658–662. doi: 10.1002/anie.201909983

Table 1.

Catalyst optimization studies.[a]

graphic file with name nihms-1054273-t0005.jpg

entry catalyst (mol%) Ecell (V) electrolyte (equiv.) other yield (%)b
  1c 13 (8) 1.5 LiClO4 (6) CFL 25
  2 14 (10) 1.5 LiClO4 (6) 60
  3 14 (10) 1.5 LiClO4 (1) 23
  4 14 (10) 1.5 TBAPF6 (1) 45
  5 14 (10) 1.5 TBABF4 (1) 60
  6 14 (10) 1.5 TBABF4 (1) CFL 18
  7 14 (10) 1.5 TBABF4 (1) no light 0
  8 14 (10) TBABF4 (1) no current 12
  9 14 (10) no current, no acid 11
10 1.5 TBABF4 (1) no catalyst 0
11 14 (10) 1.0 TBABF4 (1) 32
12 14 (10) 2.0 TBABF4 (1) 50
13 14 (20) 1.5 TBABF4 (1) 75
14 14 (15)d 1.5 TBABF4 (1) 75 (73)e

graphic file with name nihms-1054273-t0006.jpg
[a]

Reaction conditions: 11 (2.0 mmol, 5.0 equiv), 9 (0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv), electrophotocatalyst (0.04 mmol, 0.1 equiv), MeCN (6.0 mL), AcOH (4.0 mmol, 10 equiv), TBABF4 (0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv), N2, carbon felt anode, Pt cathode. Reactions performed under constant voltage conditions with irradiation for 24 h at rt.

[b]

Yields determined by 1H NMR.

[c]

2.0 ml 11 was used.

[d]

15% catalyst added in two portions, 36 h reaction time.

[e]

Yield of isolated product.