Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;7:100228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100228

Table 1.

Interobserver variability for parenchymal patterns.

Pattern n* Agreement** Kappa (95 % CI) Kappa class
Nodular pattern
Perilymphatic nodules 9.5 123/126 (98 %) 0.83 (0.64–1.02) Near perfect
Tree-in-bud nodules 15.0 122/126 (97 %) 0.85 (0.70-0.99) Near perfect
Non-tree-in-bud nodules 6.5 119/126 (94 %) 0.44 (0.04-0.84) Moderate



Ground glass 28.5 101/126 (80 %) 0.44 (0.24-0.64) Moderate



Reticular pattern 57.5 107/126 (85 %) 0.70 (0.57-0.82) Substantial
Interlobular septations 9.5 121/126 (96 %) 0.72 (0.47-0.96) Substantial
Intralobular lines 19.5 101/126 (80 %) 0.28 (0.03-0.53) Fair
Septations + lines 43.0 104/126 (83 %) 0.61 (0.46-0.76) Substantial



Crazy paving 13.5 113/126 (90 %) 0.47 (0.19-0.74) Moderate



Consolidation 43.0 110/126 (87 %) 0.72 (0.59-0.85) Substantial
Without air bronchogram 27.5 107/126 (85 %) 0.56 (0.38-0.74) Moderate
With air bronchogram 19.5 119/126 (94 %) 0.79 (0.64-0.94) Substantial



Decreased attenuation
Emphysema 24.0 110/126 (87 %) 0.61 (0.44-0.79) Substantial
Honey combing 27.0 118/126 (94 %) 0.81 (0.69-0.94) Near perfect
Other cystic patterns 6.0 124/126 (98 %) 0.83 (0.59–1.07) Near perfect
Normal 16.0 124/126 (98 %) 0.93 (0.83–1.03) Near perfect

Note: * Average number of cases are the sum of the two observers findings divided by two. ** The number of HRCTs, out of the total 126, in which the two observers agreed on whether a pattern was present or not.