Table 2. LMM Analyses on the Target Word.
Factor | SP | FFD | GD | Go-past | TFD | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | z | b | SE | t | b | SE | t | b | SE | t | b | SE | t | |
Note. Significant terms are marked in bold, and marginally significant items are underlined. b = regression coefficient. | |||||||||||||||
(Intercept) | −.11 | .08 | −1.34 | 5.53 | .02 | 269 | 5.58 | .02 | 236 | 5.72 | .03 | 208 | 5.67 | .03 | 214 |
Preview | |||||||||||||||
Syntactically infelicitous alternative versus identical | −.12 | .06 | −2.04 | .11 | .02 | 6.36 | .14 | .02 | 7.03 | .20 | .03 | 7.59 | .13 | .02 | 6.24 |
Pseudocharacter versus syntactically infelicitous alternative | −.09 | .06 | −1.45 | −.00 | .01 | −.16 | .02 | .02 | 1.14 | .01 | .02 | .49 | .01 | .02 | .62 |
Frequency: High versus low | −.01 | .05 | −.16 | .00 | .01 | .22 | .01 | .01 | 1.02 | .01 | .02 | .43 | .01 | .01 | 1.03 |
Interactions | |||||||||||||||
Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative Versus Identical × Frequency | .43 | .12 | 3.54 | .03 | .03 | 1.01 | .05 | .03 | 1.65 | .03 | .04 | .87 | −.01 | .03 | −.28 |
Pseudocharacter Versus Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative × Frequency | −.13 | .12 | −1.07 | −.03 | .03 | −1.01 | −.03 | .03 | −.97 | .03 | .04 | .79 | −.01 | .03 | −.25 |