Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;46(4):603–620. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000738

Table 2. LMM Analyses on the Target Word.

Factor SP FFD GD Go-past TFD
b SE z b SE t b SE t b SE t b SE t
Note. Significant terms are marked in bold, and marginally significant items are underlined. b = regression coefficient.
(Intercept) −.11 .08 −1.34 5.53 .02 269 5.58 .02 236 5.72 .03 208 5.67 .03 214
Preview
 Syntactically infelicitous alternative versus identical −.12 .06 −2.04 .11 .02 6.36 .14 .02 7.03 .20 .03 7.59 .13 .02 6.24
 Pseudocharacter versus syntactically infelicitous alternative −.09 .06 −1.45 −.00 .01 −.16 .02 .02 1.14 .01 .02 .49 .01 .02 .62
 Frequency: High versus low −.01 .05 −.16 .00 .01 .22 .01 .01 1.02 .01 .02 .43 .01 .01 1.03
Interactions
 Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative Versus Identical × Frequency .43 .12 3.54 .03 .03 1.01 .05 .03 1.65 .03 .04 .87 −.01 .03 −.28
 Pseudocharacter Versus Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative × Frequency −.13 .12 −1.07 −.03 .03 −1.01 −.03 .03 −.97 .03 .04 .79 −.01 .03 −.25