Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;46(4):603–620. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000738

Table 3. LMM Analyses on the Target Word When Launch Site Was Included as a Variable.

Factor SP FFD GD Go-past TFD
b SE z b SE t b SE t b SE t b SE t
Note. Significant terms are marked in bold, and marginally significant items are underlined. b = regression coefficient.
(Intercept) −.15 .13 −1.15 5.53 .02 276 5.58 .02 245 5.71 .03 208 5.67 .03 212
Preview
 Syntactically infelicitous alternative versus identical −.14 .07 −2.18 .12 .02 6.80 .15 .02 7.59 .21 .03 8.17 .13 .02 6.75
 Pseudocharacter versus syntactically infelicitous alternative −.13 .07 −2.02 −.00 .01 −.33 .01 .02 .89 .01 .02 .35 .01 .02 .58
 Frequency: High versus low .01 .05 .28 .00 .01 .31 .01 .01 1.13 .01 .02 .59 .01 .01 1.00
 Launch site −.84 .03 −26.2 −.01 .01 −2.67 −.02 .01 −4.51 .00 .01 .67 .01 .01 1.73
Interactions
 Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative Versus Identical × Frequency .42 .13 3.19 .03 .03 .96 .05 .03 1.63 .03 .04 .73 −.01 .03 −.32
 Pseudocharacter Versus Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative × Frequency −.12 .13 −.93 −.03 .03 −1.09 −.03 .03 −1.06 .03 .03 .80 −.01 .03 −.32
 Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative Versus Identical × Launch Site .09 .07 1.26 −.04 .01 −3.01 −.03 .01 −2.78 −.05 .02 −3.20 −.03 .01 −2.35
 Pseudocharacter Versus Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative × Launch Site .11 .07 1.62 −.00 .01 −.05 −.03 .01 −2.30 −.04 .01 −2.39 −.02 .01 −1.23
 Frequency × Launch Site .12 .05 2.24 −.01 .01 −.93 −.01 .01 −1.40 −.01 .01 −1.18 −.01 .01 −1.02
 Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative Versus Identical × Frequency × Launch Site −.51 .14 −3.69 .02 .02 1.02 .01 .02 .59 .01 .03 .32 −.01 .03 −.19
 Pseudocharacter Versus Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative × Frequency × Launch Site .22 .13 1.63 −.02 .02 −.97 −.02 .02 −.93 .01 .03 .18 −.03 .03 −1.21