Table 6. LMM Analyses for the Pretarget and Posttarget Character.

	SP			FFD			GD			Go-past			TFD
Factor	b	SE	z	b	SE	t	b	SE	t	b	SE	t	b	SE	t
Note. Significant terms are marked in bold, and marginally significant items are underlined. b = regression coefficient.
Pretarget character
(Intercept)	.30	.06	5.11	5.36	.02	328	5.38	.02	300	5.47	.02	230	5.53	.02	249
Preview
Syntactically infelicitous alternative versus identical	−.01	.06	−.12	.00	.01	.22	.00	.01	.25	−.01	.02	−.41	.04	.02	2.39
Pseudocharacter versus syntactically infelicitous alternative	−.12	.05	−2.28	.01	.01	.87	.01	.01	.80	.01	.02	.60	.01	.02	.33
Frequency: High versus low	.04	.04	.85	.00	.01	.06	.00	.01	.01	−.00	.01	−.17	.00	.01	.05
Interactions
Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative Versus Identical × Frequency	−.10	.11	−.87	−.03	.02	−1.26	−.04	.02	−1.59	.01	.03	.40	−.01	.03	−.46
Pseudocharacter Versus Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative × Frequency	−.02	.11	−.18	.02	.02	.98	.01	.02	.60	.02	.03	.62	.03	.03	1.11
Posttarget character
(Intercept)	.11	.05	2.06	5.43	.02	337	5.46	.02	332	5.68	.02	244	5.57	.02	261
Preview
Syntactically infelicitous alternative versus identical	−.13	.05	−2.40	.06	.01	4.37	.07	.01	4.97	.18	.02	8.32	.07	.02	3.85
Pseudocharacter versus syntactically infelicitous alternative	.04	.05	.79	−.03	.01	−1.92	−.03	.01	−2.03	−.02	.02	−1.14	−.04	.02	−2.30
Frequency: High versus low	−.02	.04	−.56	.01	.01	.60	.01	.01	.53	.04	.02	2.07	.01	.01	.39
Interactions
Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative Versus Identical × Frequency	−.09	.11	−.85	.00	.02	.03	.01	.03	.54	.03	.04	.79	.02	.03	.66
Pseudocharacter Versus Syntactically Infelicitous Alternative × Frequency	.13	.11	1.24	.00	.02	.13	.01	.03	.47	−.01	.04	−.24	−.04	.03	−1.18