Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 6;35(10):684–689. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.05.007

Table 2.

Estimated maximum visible smoke dispersal distances, with geometrical correction, at peak of exhalation, for each oxygen mask and for each respiratory model number shown in Table 1

Oxygen mask type Oxygenflow rate (L/min) Respiratory model number Estimated maximum visible dispersal distance ± geometrical correction (cm), (ie, the difference in the ratios x1/x2 and y1/y2)
Simple 10 1 9.5 ± 0.6 (ie, about 6%)
10 2 12.5 ± 0.8
10 3 8.3 ± 0.5
15 1 11.2 ± 0.7
15 2 20.7 ± 1.2
15 3 16.3 ± 1.0
Nonrebreathing 8 1 34.1 ± 3.1 (ie, about 9%)
8 2 35.8 ± 3.2
8 3 23.5 ± 2.1
10 1 24.6 ± 2.2
10 2 24.6 ± 2.2
10 3 26.3 ± 2.4
Venturi-type 6 (35% O2) 1 27.2 ± 1.1 (ie, about 4%)
6 (35% O2) 2 33.8 ± 1.4
6 (35% O2) 3 27.4 ± 1.1
6 (40% O2) 1 39.7 ± 1.6
6 (40% O2) 2 39.7 ± 1.6
6 (40% O2) 3 26.3 ± 1.1

NOTE. Each of the value of percentages shown are in the last column (6%, 9%, 4%) applies, approximately, to all measurements made for that particular oxygen mask type.